On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, at 09:50, Antoin Verschuren wrote: > This is a formal adoption request for Extensible Provisioning Protocol > (EPP) Unhandled Namespaces: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gould-casanova-regext-unhandled-namespaces/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for > adoption by REGEXT, and comment to the list, clearly stating your view.
The subject can be interesting to the working group and might warrant an RFC (although registries and registrars worked for 20 years without trouble in handling this case, so one might imagine it is maybe too late or not a big enough problem). However, as discussed previously, in its current form this draft will introduce interoperability problems[1], so this just exchanges one problem with another. So I am mildly convinced work is required, and mildly unconvinced that the draft as it stands completely address the issue. [1] TL;DR: a registrar has no way to automatically discover a registry is using the mechanism outlined in this document, as not announced in the greeting part. -- Patrick Mevzek p...@dotandco.com _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
