Hello Patrick, thanks for the very fast feedback. Responses inline:
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 9:15 PM Patrick Mevzek <p...@dotandco.com> wrote: > > As always - feedback highly appreciated! > > 3 quick ones more on the form than the substance: > > - did you look at other extensions existing? > I know at least about one having namespace > http://www.verisign-grs.com/epp/suggestion-1.1 > (I do not know the status of it as it has been removed from latest Verisign > SDK, > but it existed). > There may be others. Hmm, good point - i didn't check, didn't remember - and, indeed, there's one registered at ..., here's the direct link to the spec: https://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/EPP-Suggestion-Mapping.pdf?inc=www.verisigninc.com It does indeed serve a very similar purpose, has more options, but is also more complex. I guess i will have to talk to Scott to understand why it was removed from the SDK.. > - whatever you choose, and even if not technically important, please do not > use "ds" as an XML alias. Too much confusing with DS from DNSSEC. Right. Not a good idea, agreed. > - please stick to RFC2606 when choosing names for examples (ie: do not use > the TLD .tld) I wanted to do that, but RFC2606 sadly provides only a very limited choice. I wanted to include something else besides subdomains, that's why i went off-path of the RFC. I know i would not get that past the RFC editors, and will change this if the document progresses further. best, Alex _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
