Earlier today I took this document off the telechat and out of IESG Evaluation state.
Barry On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:30 PM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I’m not certain about the intended status of this document. I understand that > this was discussed in the group but this document does specify a protocol > extension and as such Proposed Standard or Experimental would be the two usual > choices. The shepherd write-up mentions that this extension only has a limited > scope, however, not sure what that is supposed to mean and it also doesn’t > seems a good reason for informational (but experimental maybe). There are > informational RFCs that document protocols of existing deployments for > informational purposed only, meaning that there is a good reason to have a > description of an existing protocol in a stable reference while the process of > publishing the RFC would not change any technical means of that protocol but > only document what’s out there. Usually these kind of RFC have a title like > “Campany’s X protocol for something”. However, this seems not to be the case > here or at least it's not clear from the content of the document. > > > > _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext