Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is easy to read. I have a couple of comments and nits. Feel free to ignore all of them as their sole goal is to improve your document. Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 5 -- "When performing a domain Create, either of the bundle names will be accepted. If the domain name is available, both BDN and RDN will be registered." Should it rather be "If BDN and RDN are available, then both..." ? -- Section 11 -- The 2 sentences about the experience gained in 15 years should be put in a different paragraph and even perhaps moved in the implementation status. Unsure also whether the DS/DNSKEY part should be part of the security considerations. == NITS == Generic, I find it weird to have all dates in the examples dated in 1999 or 2001 or 2012 ;-) _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
