Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-18: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I have only one COMMENT and one NITS see below. Regards, -éric == COMMENT == -- Section 3.4 -- C.1) Any reason to have a negative value for <fee:credit> ? This seems counter-intuitive to me. == NITS == Introducing <fee:cd> earlier in the text would improve the readability of the document. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
