On 29 Apr 2019, at 9:16, Peter Koch wrote:
Jim, Antoin,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:25:41PM -0400, James Galvin wrote:
Please review the milestones and respond to the list with ???+1??? or
???+1
with any updates or comments??? or just respond with your questions
or
comments.
maybe I missed it, but is an item designated as a milestone to be read
as the
point in time the respective draft is supposed to be sent to the IESG
for
approval and do you suggest that all drafts ought to go on standards
track?
The milestone can be whatever we want, within reason of course.
Our plan is that the milestone will say the document is to be submitted
for publication. It’s status will be decided as part of working group
discussion and submitted accordingly.
I expect that most documents will be submitted for a status of Proposed
Standard.
Jim
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
