Hi all,
in preparation for the discussion about
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-partial-response-00 at IETF104, I would like to
invite the WG members to approach its technical review. Here in the
following the issues I consider mostly significant:
1) Whether the WG substantially agrees about the proposed approach in
order to provide a partial response in RDAP.
2) Which field sets should be required and which response elements they
should contain. The draft defines three required field sets and declares
the corresponding list of elements.
3) Whether the field sets implemented by an RDAP server should be
presented in an appropriate metadata element and, if so, which should be
its structure. The specification described in the draft recommends
servers return responses providing additional information about the
available field sets. The metadata structure could contain different fields.
4) Whether the metadata described in this document should be included in
a more general metadata section together with other contents (e.g rate
limits, information about the server, the request, the response).
Any feedback will be very appreciated.
Regards,
mario
--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Servizi Internet e Sviluppo Tecnologico
CNR - Istituto di Informatica e Telematica
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
E-Mail:mario.loffr...@iit.cnr.it
Phone: +39.0503153497
Web:http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
