On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:55:31PM +0100, Niels ten Oever wrote: > > I strongly object to the adoption of this document as it currently stands. > > In this draft, there are no privacy considerations, and the report that is > being cited to legitimize this approach has not been adopted by ICANN the > organization or the community and was very controversial at the time of > publication. The report is being miscited as being produced by ICANN itself, > which was not the case.
It is just a draft. I hope we are not trying to get people in the habit of submitting final works into IETF wgs. I think the ICANN citation can be safely dropped, and the privacy considerations from RFC 7482/7483 adopted. > There is also no limitation or specific use defined, which makes this > protocol in direct violation of with the GDPR. So are we to subject the consideration of all IETF work against the laws of all nation-states, or are you proposing we simply use the directives of the EU as the gold standard upon which IETF drafts are to be considered? -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
