Hi,
During the IANA expert review of draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token a request
was made to scope the XML namespaces to include “epp”. The request was to
change urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:allocationToken-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:allocationToken-1.0. It was agreed to progress
draft-ietf-regext-allocation-token with the existing XML namespace, but with
the expectation that future REGEXT EPP drafts will scope the XML namespace with
“epp”. This means considering the following REGEXT working group EPP XML
namespace and schema changes. I believe that all new EPP drafts must follow
the new “epp”-scoped XML namespace pattern, and the existing REGEXT EPP drafts
should follow the “epp”-scoped XML namespace pattern unless there is an
undesired impact. The new pattern is urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:extension-1.0
for the XML namespace and urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:extension-1.0 for the
XML schema.
1. draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:fee-1.0 to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:fee-1.0
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:fee-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:fee-1.0
c. I don’t believe changing the XML namespace will have a big impact for
draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees, so my recommendation is to change it in
draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-12.
2. draft-ietf-regext-change-poll
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:changePoll -1.0
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:changePoll-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:changePoll -1.0
i.
Currently the schema registration is incorrectly set to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0. I will take care of this.
c. I believe this will have a negative impact to existing
implementations, since urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:changePoll-1.0 is a mature XML
namespace and its associated with poll messages. Changing the poll message XML
namespace will get into the unhandled XML namespace issue. My recommendation
is to keep the existing namespace based on the maturity of the namespace,
unless there is a known conflict.
3. draft-ietf-regext-org
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:org-1.0 to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:org-1.0
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:org-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:org-1.0
i.
Currently the schema registration is incorrectly set to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:org-1.0
c. I don’t believe change the XML namespace will have a big impact for
draft-ietf-regext-org, so my recommendation is to change it in
draft-ietf-regext-org-09.
4. draft-ietf-regext-org-ext
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:orgext-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:orgext-1.0
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:orgext-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:orgext-1.0
i.
Currently the schema registration is missing, so it needs to be added.
c. I don’t believe change the XML namespace will have a big impact for
draft-ietf-regext-org-ext, so my recommendation is to change it in
draft-ietf-regext-org-ext-08.
5. draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:b-dn-1.0 to urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:b-dn-1.0
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:b-dn-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:b-dn-1.0
c. I don’t know the impacts of changing the XML namespace for
draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration.
6. draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:verificationCode-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:verificationCode-1.0
i.
The draft is missing the “urn:” URI prefix in the registration request. I will
take care of this.
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:verificationCode-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:verificationCode-1.0
i.
The draft is missing the “urn:” URI prefix and needs to replace “:ns:” with
“:schema:”. I will take care of this.
c. Based on Production systems in place leveraging this XML namespace, my
recommendation is to keep the existing namespace unless there is a known
conflict.
7. draft-ietf-regext-validate
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:validate-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:validate-1.0
i.
The draft is missing the “urn:” URI prefix in the registration request.
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:validate-1.0 to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:validate-1.0
i.
The draft is missing the XML schema registration.
c. I don’t know the impacts of changing the XML namespace for
draft-ietf-regext-validate.
8. draft-sattler-epp-registry-maintenance
a. urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:maintenance-0.N to
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-0.N
i.
The draft is missing the XML namespace registration
b. urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:maintenance-0.N to
urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:maintenance-0.N
c. This draft is setup to support new XML schema namespaces, so my
recommendation is to include the “epp”-scoped XML namespace with
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:maintenance-0.3.
I took the action item to bring this up with the working group, so please
respond with your thoughts on the new requested pattern and the impacts for the
existing drafts.
Thanks,
—
JG
[cid:image001.png@01D255E2.EB933A30]
James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com
703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
