On Tue, May 22, 2018, at 14:23, Gould, James wrote: > Referring to the language in the RFC is the starting point in the > discussion related to defining the problem that may or may not require a > solution.
If everything is already crystal clear from the existing documents I do not know why you even presented 4 different options at the beginning of the thread. So if everything is clear, there are no options, and no problem to solve either. I can hence leave this conversation where it is. > I disagree that we should look at the various implementation > policies implemented in the wild by registries and registrars to develop > the appropriate interpretation of the RFC. Which is absolutely not what I said. So I will stop here, as I may be doing more harm than benefits to the WG by continuing. Regards, -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
