> -----Original Message----- > From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:rep.dot....@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:35 PM > To: regext@ietf.org; Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>; > 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-rdap- > object-tag-00.txt > > On 12 February 2018 15:29:02 CET, "Hollenbeck, Scott" > <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet- > >> dra...@ietf.org > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 8:50 AM > >> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > >> Cc: regext@ietf.org > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] I-D Action: > >draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object- > >> tag-00.txt > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >> directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG > >of > >> the IETF. > >> > >> Title : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) > >Object > >> Tagging > >> Authors : Scott Hollenbeck > >> Andrew Lee Newton > >> Filename : draft-ietf-regext-rdap-object-tag-00.txt > >> Pages : 12 > >> Date : 2018-01-16 > > > >There's been no comment on this document in the month since it was > >noted on this list. Does anyone have anything to say about the proposed > >practice? > > Isn't a separate tag registry redundant wrt the existing ROID-suffix > registry?
No, because not all RDAP server operators register ROIDs. Address registries and registrars, for example, don't register ROIDs - but they may want to run RDAP servers. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
