OK, I see your point. Documented in an appendix in
draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root-05.txt as a possible alternative.
Thanks.
Now my question is that since we have a workable approach that does not
require a new EPP extension, and since (in my opinion at least) DNAMEs as
2LDs are an actively bad idea, what need is there for this extension?
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
