Hello Scott, On Thu, Dec 28, 2017, at 15:11, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > ...but this isn't really "after the fact".
It is, because the RDAP RFCs are already done, and the main reason not to add more structure to them and going the way you propose is that the structure is already done and what you document is what is done on the field. > A minor value change like > this can be done easily in the context of a migration to RDAP. It may mean a small *technical* change but I believe it to be a big *semantic* (design) change and not in the good direction to my thinking. However I think the rough consensus on the issue is clear, so we will remain in a disagreement on this specific issue, but the draft would go along. -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
