Hello Roger, On 2017-08-07 18:50, Roger D Carney wrote:
> Good Morning, > > Thomas, I think the Fee draft can handle your use case of using launch > phase for premium names (a premium string is only available in one > phase/subphase combination so if client does not pass phase you should > return that one valid combination). Can you provide examples where it > does not work? See my previous response to Jody: strictly interpreting the fee extension, we would not be allowed to return the right phase/subphase combination, since, technically, multiple phases are continually active at the same time in our model. However (and I'm warming up to the idea), interpreting the "active" attribute as *specific to a particular domain name* (rather than as a general term) would indeed make it feasible. Best regards, Thomas -- TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of: Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222 Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 D-44227 Dortmund E-Mail: supp...@tango-rs.com Germany _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
