Patrick Mevzek wrote: > I do not agree with "the default period whould be 1 year". > The default number of years should not be part of the protocol, since it is a > policy item. Some registries may wish, specially at launch time, to > use 2 years or 5 years as default period. > > So, please do not hardcode any value in the protocol, and for example > use the same phrasing as the one used in RFC5731 : > An OPTIONAL <domain:period> element that contains the initial > registration period of the domain object. A server MAY define a > default initial registration period if not specified by the > client.
+1 I would even go a step further, and ask the Authors to define that the default for the "period" element in the fee extension MUST be identical to the server defined "domain:period" value. Anything else would be highly confusing to the registrar. best, Alex _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
