I do agree we should have 2 hours, and we should use at least half of the time on document work, maybe in smaller "interest groups". I'd specifically be interested in progress on the Fee document.
Alex > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Andrew > Newton > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2017 15:21 > An: Roger D Carney > Cc: regext@ietf.org > Betreff: Re: [regext] Meeting in Chicago > > I think we need 2 hours as well. > > -andy > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> > wrote: > > Good Morning, > > > > > > > > I agree with Scott, I would like to see two one hour sessions. > > > > > > > > In the working session, I would like to propose working on > > draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-01 (this draft will be published later this > > week). This has been updated to reflect most of the discussions from the > > past year and should be really close to being complete. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Roger > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, > Scott > > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 6:26 AM > > To: i...@antoin.nl; regext@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [regext] Meeting in Chicago > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin > > > >> Verschuren > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 3:41 AM > > > >> To: regext <regext@ietf.org> > > > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Meeting in Chicago > > > >> > > > >> Dear working group, > > > >> > > > >> It's time again to start scheduling for our next meeting. > > > >> The chairs need to make a meeting request before this friday. > > > >> We intend to meet in Chicago, but following up on our discussion in > > > >> Seoul, we have an important question for you: > > > >> > > > >> Do you want one traditional meeting slot only discussing progress, or > > > >> do you want two 1 hour slots with one slot reserved as a working > > > >> session on doing actual work on documents? > > > >> > > > >> Please let us know before friday. > > > > > > > > There hasn't been much progress on anything (or extensive discussion > without > > resolution that has impeded progress), so I think I'd prefer the "two 1 > hour > > slots with one slot reserved as a working session" option. If we go that > > route I would like to ask for some time to talk about the three drafts I'm > > working on that are currently individual submissions: > > > > > > > > > > > > draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-openid > > > > draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag > > > > draft-fregly-regext-rdap-search-regex > > > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > regext mailing list > > > > regext@ietf.org > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > regext mailing list > > regext@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
