From: Gustavo Lozano [mailto:gustavo.loz...@icann.org] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:56 PM To: Ulrich Wisser; Hollenbeck, Scott; regext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [regext] WG I-Ds in the IANA EPP Extensions Registry
Yes, it is sufficient if the extension is submitted to the IANA Registry. My question is about the I-Ds that are going through the IETF process. For example, Registries that have currently implemented draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees. If it's not appropriate to register those (I-Ds going through the IETF process) in the IANA EPP extension Registry, we will need to support the old method of manually uploading the documentation through the portal. If the uploading mechanism is not supported, the Registries will be required to use the IANA EPP extension registry, and as a result, the IANA EPP Registry will be used more. [SAH] The normal process for items to be added to a registry as part of an IANA action identified in an Internet-Draft is for the action to be completed when the document is approved for publication as an RFC. I explained why in my earlier response - Internet-Drafts are not stable and do not represent community consensus. Scott
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
