Jim, thanks,

I have been busy with $dayjob, but before my questions below are answered I do 
not think the document is ready. I did not feel I had to repeat them.

   Patrik

On 17 Jun 2016, at 15:36, James Galvin wrote:

> Gustavo,
>
> Unfortunately, as Patrik noted, the document needs a normative reference to a 
> matching algorithm.  You have stated that you will bring that to the 
> attention of the appropriate ICANN folks, but I do not see how this document 
> can move forward without that.
>
> It is a technical issue and affects interoperability, which makes a 
> resolution essential.
>
> I’m interested in other opinions but I do not believe this document can move 
> forward without this.
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On 16 Jun 2016, at 19:35, Gustavo Lozano wrote:
>
>> Dear chairs, working group,
>>
>>
>> I have not received any further comments on the draft
>> (draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec).
>>
>>
>> I think that version 01 of the draft
>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-01)
>> is ready for publication.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gustavo
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/3/16, 11:50, "James Galvin" <gal...@elistx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I want to remind the working group that we have the following unresolved
>>> comments regarding draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec.  We need to address
>>> these comments before this document can move forward.
>>>
>>> And please note that draft-ietf-regext-launchphase is dependent on this
>>> document.  It is ready for publication but can not move forward until we
>>> can move both it and tmch-func-spec together.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 Apr 2016, at 1:53, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>>>
>>>> Comments (some of this can also be fund in SSAC document SAC-060 23
>>>> July 2013):
>>>>
>>>> 1. It is not clear how permutations of strings are to be calculated
>>>> (by whom, and how) in the case confusability risks might arise. For
>>>> example by the use of language tables or other mechanisms like LGRs.
>>>>
>>>> 2. The term "leftmost" is a bit confusing when talking about labels in
>>>> DNS. I propose using "first" as in logical order.
>>>>
>>>> 3. The matching algorithm is not described, who is implementing it
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> 4. There are no instructions on how to handle cases where the matching
>>>> algorithm in TMCH is different from matching algorithm one "expect"
>>>> ("one" as in the trademark holder).
>>>>
>>>>    Patrik
>>>>
>>>> On 22 Apr 2016, at 22:39, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>>> directories.
>>>>> This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions of
>>>>> the IETF.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Title           : ICANN TMCH functional specifications
>>>>> Author          : Gustavo Lozano
>>>>>   Filename        : draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-00.txt
>>>>>   Pages           : 60
>>>>>   Date            : 2016-04-22
>>>>>
>>>>> Abstract:
>>>>>    This document describes the requirements, the architecture and the
>>>>>   interfaces between the ICANN Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) and
>>>>> Domain Name Registries as well as between the ICANN TMCH and Domain
>>>>> Name Registrars for the provisioning and management of domain names
>>>>> during Sunrise and Trademark Claims Periods.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec/
>>>>>
>>>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-tmch-func-spec-00
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
>>>>> tools.ietf.org.
>>>>>
>>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>>>> i-d-annou...@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>>>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> regext mailing list
>>>> regext@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to