Hi all, On 05/05/2016 18:45, Gavin Brown wrote:
> Roger proposed moving the <period> element up a level, so that it > applied to every <command> element. This is appealing as it simplifies > the syntax, but would it cause problems for clients when servers offer a > discount for multii-year registrations/renewals, and clients therefore > need to query for the registration/renewal fee over multiple periods in > order to display this information to the user? TBH I don't know if there > are any servers which do this, so feedback on this point will be > appreciated. I've not received any feedback, so I am going to allow the <fee:period> element to be a child of <fee:command> rather than <fee:check>. G. -- Gavin Brown Chief Technology Officer CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC) Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries https://www.centralnic.com/ CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
