** Reply to message from Hyung Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:06:33 -0700
> My iptables/nat is configured to allow all internal computers to freely > access the internet. To host a gamevoice session, I forwarded port 9110 > to my internal windows box: > > (iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d xx.xx.xx.xx -p udp --destination-port > 9110 -i eth0 -j DNAT --to yy.yy.yy.yy > > Where xx.xx.xx.xx. is the public/external IP address, and yy.yy.yy.yy is > the local/private IP of the machine running Game Voice.) > > No luck....I wondered if its even possible to use gamevoice through > iptables. A few things: 1) Never hurts to add the inbound interface to your rule. 2) Are you sure udp is the only protocol involved in gamevoice? 3) Are you sure you only need to worry about one port? If there is a data and a control channel on separate ports, a "helper" netfilter extension would likely have to be coded. jb -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
