This actually turned out to be a hardware issue and not an OS issue. Our memory in the 6650 DELL (they maybe, didn't test it well enough) wasn't up to par. At any rate, it was a DIMM in mem bank 2 that held us up for 9 days!?!?
A note to anyone out there who buy's DELL's. Great products, just install there Open Management products. It might save you 9 days. Regards. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Monical [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Advanced Server - Oracle 9i install issues Looks like this is a not a "certified" configuration Here is what Orale sez about 7.1............ I have not tried this install yet APPENDIX A - Solutions for the relinking problem seen with Oracle 9.0.1 on Red Hat 7.1. Option 1: (remove "-z defs" from genclntsh file) (Workaround) 1. When you get errors from OUI installer, open a window, and cd to the Oracle Home installation target location 2. Set Oracle environment ORACLE_HOME to this target directory. 3. Use editor to modify $ORACLE_HOME/bin/genclntsh file, to remove -z defs from it. 4. Then run this script $ORACLE_HOME/bin/genclntsh to create Oracle libraries. 5. Go back to OUI error window, and click on retry bottom to continue. Option 2: (update the binutils) You have to follow these steps to solve the re-linking problem: 1. Update the binutils-2.10.91.0.2-3 to binutils-2.10.91.0.4-1 2. You can get the binutils patch at the following URL: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/bin utils-2.10.91.0.4-1.i386.rpm 3. Relink Oracle binaries. At 05:26 PM 8/29/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Has anyone had any issues with installing Oracle 9i on an Advanced Server? >We currently have RH-AS 2.1 loaded on a Dell 6650 with 12 GB of mem. and 4 >X 1.6 GB Xeons. > >Oracle 9.0.1 R2 stalls on Linking. It gets as far as 61% then begins to >eat up cpu time and hangs the box. >We successfully installed the same media (RH-AS & Oracle 9i) on a Dell >2400 with no issues. >I guess my question is, what could be so different that Oracle wont >install on our 6650 but will on our 2400??? > >Any suggestions would be much appreciated. > > >Jim Purtell<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = >"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> >Systems Administrator >Henkels & McCoy, Inc. >Office: 215-283-8016 >Fax: 215-283-7702 > > > > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
