On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 08:52, Patrick Nelson wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: > ----------------->>>> > The name server responsible for resolving the reverse queries for the > 65.106.254.x network isn't configured properly. Your server was > referred to is as the authority for that zone, but it thinks that > another server is the authority. > ----------------->>>> ... > > Well that is interesting... So the lame server is configured incorrectly > and has my server listed as the authority... which its not! ... > This kinda matches what Jonathan says. I was just concerned that this was > some kind of an attempt to circumvent my nameserver.
I'm sorry if my email led you to that conclusion. Reading it again, I'm afraid it came out as nonsense :( I meant that your server looked up the authority for those reverse domains and tried to resolve its query against that server, which returned an answer but also claimed that it was not the authority. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
