On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bret Hughes wrote: > > >> >And thanks for that. But there's no Enigma-list there yet... > >> > >> <dtalk presents himself for the inevitable "I told you so" from > >> Galpin...>
rofl. but here it is anyway ... "I told you so" > >I was wondering about that myself but did not have the balls to ask > >about it since I have been unable to read the thing due to time > >constraints. There is a really good argument that this is an even > >better reason to have a useful archive :) exactly my thinking. But grumpy here... > It's (partly) a resource issue, and (mostly) a maintenance issue. I > can't really discuss this without expressing my profound distaste for > Red Hat's release-specific lists, so you'll have to hear that up > front. > > That said, I'll take this thread as a strong indication that I should > consider including them in the archive. It probably won't happen > until summer, though. I'll ping you next week David. I setup those scripts ready to support multiple archives. I can get the enigma archives up in a snap. And yes, this is exactly why we need the archives. I don't have time for another list - I'm 1550 messages behind on this one! BTW, how are we looking on the donation front? charles _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
