-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bret Hughes wrote:
>AH HA! I think this is the solution from the NAT howto. I thought there >was a redirect thing going to happen. It turns out, according to this >that the solution is to SNAT these packets to the NAT box as well as the >DNAT. <poke> Um ... yeah, that's what we've been saying. Glad you could join us, Bret. :-) </poke> - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp - -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/pale_blue_dot.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPEn7ub9BpdPKTBGtEQI+NgCfWUW6dfZ1T1AlpsZJwycEoeO8YW0AoMMH TWxpy1naYuFqh/frrCZdo8x4 =3yZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
