This highlights further that you can't trust "trust-e". How on earth did the MS policy get through a Trust-e audit? Did they even bother with an audit? Was it a simple mistake? Was it a back-hander? Who cares! The point is that trust-e has failed in its remit on a grand scale and evidently cannot be trusted... Graham. >On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:06:32AM -0400, Chuck Mead wrote: > > > > http://www.moongroup.com/stories.php?story=01/04/02/0156291 > >An interesting followup: > >http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-5508903.html?tag=tp_pr >-- > Dave Ihnat > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Dave Ihnat
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Rodolfo J. Paiz
- RE: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Chapman, Matt
- RE: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! kevin
- RE: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Rodolfo J. Paiz
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Neil Jolly
- re: RE: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! kabir
- RE: RE: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! TANNER
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Wolfgang Pfeiffer
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Wolfgang Pfeiffer
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Graham Hemmings
- Re: [OT] Microsoft should be feared and despised! Craig Bull