This highlights further that you can't trust "trust-e".

How on earth did the MS policy get through a Trust-e audit?

Did they even bother with an audit? Was it a simple mistake? Was it a 
back-hander?  Who cares!

The point is that trust-e has failed in its remit on a grand scale and 
evidently cannot be trusted...


Graham.


>On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:06:32AM -0400, Chuck Mead wrote:
> >
> > http://www.moongroup.com/stories.php?story=01/04/02/0156291
>
>An interesting followup:
>
>http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-5508903.html?tag=tp_pr
>--
>         Dave Ihnat
>         [EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to