Nitebirdz wrote:

> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 23:38:19 -0600
> > From: Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Connection refused to X server
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I must have screwed something up today.  When I su to root and try to execute a 
>program (red-carpet), I get the following:
> > >
> > > Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
> > > Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server
> > >
> > > Any idea what might be causing this, or better yet, how to fix it?
> > >
> >
> > the user running x has no given root the right to use the display.  as
> > the user issue the command
> > xhost +localhost
> >
> > this gives all users on the local machine the right to use your display.
> >   I do no know how to do this for a single user only.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Bret
> >
>
> The manual page has the answer to this:
>
>        [+]name The  given  name  (the  plus  sign is optional) is
>                added to the list allowed  to  connect  to  the  X
>                server.   The  name  can  be a host name or a user
>                name.
>

Is this also considered a  bad design ? What if there is a user with the same name as
a host , which takes precedence ? Hmm...

>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Nitebirdz
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.linuxnovice.org
> News, tips, articles, links...
>
> *** http://www.mozilla.org ***
> Fight the Microsoft.Net world domination strategy!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to