On 29 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød spewed into the bitstream:
TEG>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TEG>
TEG>> On 29 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød spewed into the bitstream:
TEG>>
TEG>> TEG>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TEG>> TEG>
TEG>> TEG>> Regarding CERT Advisory CA-2001-02 there is no vulnerability statement
TEG>> TEG>> for Red Hat's bind packages for 6.2 or 7.0. Does anybody know if there's
TEG>> TEG>> a problem or not?
TEG>> TEG>
TEG>> TEG>An errata is upcoming - it's in QA.
TEG>>
TEG>> Good... thanx... will it cover 6.2 and 7.0
TEG>
TEG>Looks like it (not one of my packages...)
TEG>
TEG>> and will it be out today?
TEG>
TEG>Probably. Of course, that assumes nothing fails.
Okay... welp... I've gone ahead and built 8.2.3 rpms for 7.0. Now I have
to do a 6.2 version... (too many machines to wait for 'em I'm afraid).
Once the RH updates are done I will load those overtop of mine... the
"official" RPM's always seem to have patches in them that are nice to
have...:-)
--
Chuck Mead, Owner, MoonGroup.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Note: all html mail sent to me is deleted unread)
GnuPG Public Key Available: http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
