first off, wow, thanks for answering all my questions, it really explained a
lot...
but more questions...=)
> |why is it that i can get gnome apps running in kde2, but they don't look
> | half as good as if they were running in gnome/enlightenment?
>
> I think it's because somehow, when run in KDE 2.0, KDE doesn't seem to
> honour $HOME/.gtkrc. Please CMIIW. It has something to do with the toolkit
> that default GNOME apps use. The default toolkit used for GNOME compliant
> apps is GTK while for KDE, it is QT.
what does CMIIW mean? does this mean gnapster on my system running KDE2 will
never look like the screenshots from the website?
> |i think i read a post on a newsgroup once abou running enlightenment in
> | kde2. the poster said that if he does this, he'd lose a lot of
> | functionality of kde2, but it would look a lot better. what does this
> | mean?
>
> Default functionality in KDE that is tight-up with kwm will be lost if kwn
> is replaced by other window managers.
what is default functionality (is it worth losing? =)? i've seen lots of
screenshots of enlightenment and apps running on gnome/enlightenment, will
these apps never look as pretty running on my system running KDE2?
basically, how can i get gnapster to look like the screenshots on its
homepage without installing gnome? =)
thanks again for the help...
christopher
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
