Thanks for the amazingly quick response, guys, but no one seemed to have really understood my concern, or at least addressed it in their replies. So I'll try again (please read carefully). I wrote:

SO...long story short, I can't install glibc because it will break rpm, BUT if I install the new RPM first, it will fail because I've still got the old glibc, and I'll have no way to install the new one, because I need a working "rpm" to do that....<sigh>

To spell it out: Yes, I KNOW I can use --nodeps to force installation, and "-U" to upgrade a package instead of "-i" to install it.. (I've RTFM.) That's not the point. My worry is that if I DO force installation of one or more of the packages involved, I'll break RPM and then not be able to install anything at all afterwards - including any packages that might dig me out of that hole.

If someone has *specific* advice that involves this sort of problem WHEN RPM IS ONE OF THE PACKAGES INVOLVED IN THE DEPENDENCY CONFLICT (please read that sentence again), I'm all ears. Thanks.

-David

Reply via email to