> Well, I'm very confused. I have heard lots of people talk about the poor
> performance that Solaris has, and I have to admit that I am suffering the low
> performance, even on ULTRA-SPARC. What I want is technical reasons of why
> Linux would be a better shot then Solaris. I would like to know how each
> kernel works. How do the allocate memory, etc.
All I can tell you about Solaris, is that on an x86.. it's known to suck
(memory wise).
> In this case, Intel is the desided platform (hardware), but the chief wants
> Solaris, and we have suffered to much with Solaris so far, that I would
> prefer to use Linux.
Linux is known for running with equal performance across all
architectures.
-Statux
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
