On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:18:59PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On that note, however... What advantages does pump (the current > non-BUSTED one, assuming it's stable) have over dhcpcd? It would SEEM Maybe none. The drift of the conversation has been 'don't use pump because of blah, blah...'. I think we were pointing out whatever shortcomings may have existed at one time, are not there anymore. At lease AFAICT <g>. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- pump vs dhcpcd James C. Bevier
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Kevin Holmquist
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Charles Galpin
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Charles Galpin
- RE: pump vs dhcpcd Jamin Collins
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Hal Burgiss
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- RE: pump vs dhcpcd Jamin Collins
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Wayne Dyer
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Steven W. Orr
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Michael H. Warfield
- Re: pump vs dhcpcd Cokey de Percin