On Sun, 27 Aug 2000, Manuel A. Camacho Q. wrote: > Depends on what you call "old". I am running even 6.2 in a 486 with 24 > MB RAM. And 5.0 & 5.2 will definitely do. No problem with Y2K. > OTOH, there are "exploits" known for those versions of linux, which may or may not have been patched.... John _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality kabir
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Manuel A. Camacho Q.
- strange log messages John Aldrich
- strange log messages Charles Galpin
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Bret Hughes
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Bret Hughes
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Nitebirdz
- RE: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Ward William E PHDN
- RE: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Bill Carlson
- Re: RH 5.0., RH 5.2 functionality Gustav Schaffter