On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Vidiot wrote: > >Can we lose the [RHL] prefix? It's silly, clutters up the list of > >messages, and generally makes it harder to read. > >Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human. > > NO DO NOT LOSE THE PREFIX!!!! > > I am a subscriber of many lists and the prefix helps me determine from > which mail list the message comes from. > > I am very happy to see that it was added to this list. > > MB > -- I agree, totally. When you subscribe to many lists and get 150 emails a day, it's very helpful to to have the prefix to quickly goto certain list messages. - Martin J. Brown, Jr. - - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - NEW!! PGP Public Key ID: 0xCED9BD8A Key Server: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Adam Goucher
- [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ;) This silly [R... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ;) This ... Vidiot
- Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ;) T... Bob Taylor
- Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ;) T... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Vidiot
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Charles Galpin
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Kambiz Aghaiepour
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Bret Hughes
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Nitebirdz
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Martin Brown
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. John Aldrich
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Danny
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Anthony E . Greene
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Steve Frampton
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Anthony E . Greene
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Peter Kiem
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Glen Lee Edwards
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Romain Kang