Ok, I got a bit of time over the weekend to try it, so I can now answer
my own question:

On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 10:39:00AM +0000, Thomas Ribbrock Design/DEG" wrote:
[...] 
> b) Is it possible to install RHL 5.2 using the RHL 6.0 installation
>    disk? The 6.0 disk boots fine... Reason I'm asking is that the menu
>    you get when you boot from the installation disks states that it can
>    be used to install Red Hat Linux from version 2.0 - hence my idea to
>    use the 6.0 version for 5.2.

Answer: It doesn't work. Interestingly enough, most of the install seems
to work - the main problem appears to be the different rpm versions used
in 5.2 and 6.0, as I got several error messages with regard to rpmrc and
the RPM database. The latter caused the install to fail.

Fortunately, on third try, I got the updated RHL 5.2 boot.img to boot on
that machine, so I have 5.2 running. I was quite impressed - minimal
install (no X, no devel, no gcc/egcs - only all that's necessary to do
PPP, masquerading, ssh and a bit of mail maybe) in ~120MB.
I also compiled a monolithic 2.0.38 kernel which is a good bit smaller
than the default one - cuts down on memory footprint and boot-up time...
:-)

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
             "Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"

     Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to