Jason.
Could you send me a basic ospf gated.conf file?


Jason Scherbarth wrote:

> Doh!
>
> Forgot one thing.  Make sure you are using the latest version of
> GateD(in the RH 5.1distribution).  Until recently Linux GateD had
> problems with listening to the multicast route information (HELLO
> packets), no trouble sourcing it...  I've got GateD set up and running
> OSPF on about 10 RH 5.0 boxes for compatibility testing with our OSPF
> implementation and they've worked flawlessly.
>
> js
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Scherbarth
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 3:04 PM
> > To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject:      RE: RFC linux as router
> >
> > Essentially dead on.  Small edits below...
> >
> >       -----Original Message-----
> >       From:   William T Wilson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >       Sent:   Wednesday, June 24, 1998 2:32 PM
> >       To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >       Subject:        Re: RFC linux as router
> >
> >       On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, dreamwvr wrote:
> >
> >       > linux box as a router? Would like to ideally get intimate with
> > using
> >       > bgp and ospf using red hat as a router over 100 base T. Is
> > this
> >       > different than setting up two nics and doing route add and
> > default route?
> >
> >       No.  bgp and ospf are routing protocols.  When you run a routing
> > protocol,
> >       you typically have at least three network interfaces (and 64MB
> > of RAM :) )
> >       in your system.  One or more for your local network(s) and at
> > least two
> >       for connectivity to the rest of the Internet.
> >       [Jason Scherbarth]  Depends on what you are doing...
> >       Suppose you have two uplinks to the Internet - one through MCI,
> > and one
> >       through Sprint, say.  You needs some sort of protocol by which
> > you can
> >       determine which sites should be reached through the MCI link,
> > and which
> >       sites should be reached through the Sprint link.  Obviously
> > sites
> >       connecting to MCI or Sprint will go through that link, but sites
> > on, say,
> >       UUNet will have to go through one or the other.  The routing
> > protocols are
> >       how the routers determine which sites go through which links.
> > All the
> >       routers on the Internet maintain a database of, essentially, how
> >       "expensive" it is to connect to any other site through any
> > particular
> >       link.  Every router simply sends the data through the cheapest
> > link.
> >
> >       BGP is the protocol used internet-wide for such calculations.
> >       [Jason Scherbarth]  BGP is essentially a Cisco proprietary
> > routing protocol.  GateD *does* work with BGP, but you'll find that
> > alot of other vendor's network equipment does not.  OSPF is more open
> > in the sense that many more vendors will support it.    OSPF is
> >       used in other WAN situations.  For example, suppose you have a
> > large WAN
> >       with many ISDN lines coming in, and several terminal servers for
> > them.
> >       Each of those terminal servers functions as the gateway for all
> > networks
> >       attached to them over an ISDN link.  But the networks on the far
> > side of
> >       the ISDN connections don't know when they'll connect or who
> > they'll get
> >       when they dial in.  So the terminal server uses OSPF to tell the
> > other
> >       systems in the network that he is the current gateway to that
> > particular
> >       subnet.  But the rest of the Internet doesn't care, because once
> > it gets
> >       to your WAN, that's all it needs to know.  Therefore BGP is used
> > at your
> >       router to connect to the rest of the internet, and OSPF is
> > typically used
> >       internally within an organization.
> >
> >       Cisco routers excel at this sort of thing.  gated can do it too.
> >
> >       > I suppose i will have to do a arp -s ext interface mac address
> > 1
> >
> >       I don't think so.  You shouldn't need to fool with the arp table
> > at all.
> >
> >       > but am really not sure if there is any more to it. Hmmm...
> > also do
> >       > i have to do a make config to rebuild the kernel to do this?
> > Been
> >
> >       You should.  Any time you do anything serious you should rebuild
> > the
> >       kernel.  :)  In particular look at the "optimize as router, not
> > host"
> >       compile-time option.
> >
> >
> >       --
> >         PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
> > ARCHIVES!
> >       http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
> > /mailing-lists
> >                To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with
> >                              "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
> --
>   PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
>          To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to