On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:14:00 -0700
"Chris W. Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hey Chris,

> Sean Estabrooks <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     on Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:56 PM said:
> 
> > If there is an online reference to more information that's a
> > great thing to include in an answer, but why make a paragraph
> > out of an answer that can be stated with a quick example?
> 
> Because it's more informative and helpful.

Sure in certain cases.   But often it's more helpful just to give
the command.

> 
> > Often a person who is just learning about Linux does not have
> > enough context yet to appreciate some of the subtleties of a
> > solution. In these cases especially, a quick answer solves their
> > immediate problem and should provide inspiration for them on how
> > to proceed in the future.
> 
> Should, but doesn't necessarily.

That's really up to the poster.

> 
> > If the solution to a problem is to "set SHMMAX to blah value" then
> > that is the proper answer to a question.    If you have the time to
> > explain the highlights of why it works that's even better.
> 
> Yes, and that's what he did.
> 

Wasn't talking about this case, was talking about the general
statements Jason was making.

> > The correct answer should lead them to the correct source for more
> > information. If it's not obvious where this information can be found
> > it's great if you can cite a reference for them.
> > 
> > For example if you tell someone that the answer to their problem is
> > a specific iptable command, then clearly they will know they need
> > to read more about iptables.
> 
> Clearly?
> 
Yes, clearly.


> > No need to tell them to do that in each and every post.
> 
> For that to be the case we'd need to have some sort of collective mind,
> or hive mind (ala the Borg) where eveyone knows exactly what everyone
> else knows. You learn something, I learn it too. 
> 
> Unfortunately this is the real world and your statement can't possibly
> be true since people continuously ask the same questions.
> 
> >> Not to mention, they're more likely to offer the same assistance to
> >> others later on.  :)
> > 
> > IMHO, more people are served by seeing the correct answer.
> 
> This is true.
> 
Wow, we agree on something ;o)

> > They're already looking for the correct answer, just give it to them.
> > Don't assume someone asking a question is stupid and needs to be told
> > to go do more research. Obviously when you've asked questions on the
> list
> > you were looking for an answer not someone to teach you how to "fish".
> 
> Man I'm totally confused by your post. The original poster ASKED to be
> taught how to fish INSTEAD of being thrown a fish.
> 

Again, talking about his general statements, not this case.


> Am I completely missing the point of your post?
> 

Apparently ;-P

> 
> So confus-ed!!
> 

Cheers,
Sean


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to