On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 16:51, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On 05 Sep 2003 16:30:03 -0500
> Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:10, Peter Fleck wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm 
> > > wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to 
> > > happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in 
> > > normally with no problem. Can we change some setting to make this go 
> > > away?
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > 

snip
> > If there is a fix as well as stopping the login delay on a successful
> > logins (where is the information leakage there?) I would like to know
> > about it since I really like to keep the installation on my 4 servers as
> > stock as possible.
> > 
> 
> Hey Bret,
> 
> You can add the "nodelay" option in /etc/pam.d/system-auth:
> 
> auth        sufficient    /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so likeauth nodelay
> 
> I do have a one line source change that removes the need for 
> the above, has zero information leak, and still presents a delay if 
> someone types a password incorrectly.  The patch makes the
> sshd_config option "PermitEmptyPasswords" more meaningful when
> set to "no".  (ie. sshd no longer asks pam if the user can log in without
> a password).   Nobody seems interested in the patch upstream though.  

I don't know what the recourse would be if I were to really raise hell. 
It appears that the maintainer of RH packages has the power to declare
issues NOTABUG and I do not know the procedure to go over them.

I pleaded on one of the bug threads not to NOTABUG this issue since it
damn well is a big and rendered the package unusable for me.  I pay
attnetion to who is trying to get to the six boxes I maintain that are
directly connected to the internet and filling the logs with crap is
unacceptable.

Shit I done got all pissed off again.

> If you'd like an updated RPM let me know.
> 

Does either of these also fix the bogus auth failure messages?

That is the thing that really irks me, and Ben too I guess :)

Bret


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to