On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 10:12, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:02:31AM -0800, Cliff Wells wrote: > [...] > > explicitly allows for GPL'd software to be sold. But "free speech" > > definitely implies that it can't be "bootlegged", even if it is sold > > otherwise. > [...] > > Point well taken. Of course you're right. However, my main concern is > that people keep equalling "GPL" with "at no kost" - that's what I was > aiming at. The (in)famous "free speech" vs. "free beer" thingy... :-)
A lot of people seem to equate GPL with shareware. I've just come to accept it, lest my fingers fall off ;) -- Cliff Wells, Software Engineer Logiplex Corporation (www.logiplex.net) (503) 978-6726 x308 (800) 735-0555 x308 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
