> - "How does Red Hat feel about programs like BitTorrent as a primary > method of distribution?" > > If your willing to use BitTorrent to avoid paying $60 then you would > probably also be willing to wait a week to avoid paying $60. Even if > BitTorrent became the most popular (or "primary") method of distribution, > it still does not become an "offical" channel. There are several RHN > customers that will not use an unoffical BitTorrent and may not even be > willing to use an FTP mirror. If you want to demand an offical method of > access, Red Hat provides RHN. If your willing to get it via unoffical > methods then that is good too.
Was my post really that hard to understand? It seemed pretty clear to me but it should, I wrote it. Let me try to explain. Pretend I posted this next Monday and the iso's are on every FTP server in the world, now let me ask the question. "How does Red Hat feel about utilizing BitTorrent as a major method of official distribution." They would create the .torrent file. and seed the ISO's. And people are actually able to get shrike without having to wait 2 weeks to find an open slot on an ftp server. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
