They changed to policy on this yesterday. The 2 major number versions now comes from Advanced server numbering. As this is much slower, your RHCE will last alot longer.
Mark Quoting Joe Polk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The whole idea of outdating RHCE's at this time is stupid. There is not > significant differences between most RH versions since 6.0 to warrant > it. Yes, I realize iptables came along, new kernels, and the abandonment > of inetd but is that a reason for EOFing RHCE's? Maybe I'm missing > something but I don't think so. The bulk of Linux in general is the > same. It's not nearly the difference between Netware 3.12 and 4.11 or NT > and 2000. And for the price paid, If I had my RHCE for say 7.3, I'd > consider myself certified to any employer until after RH9. > > <<JAV>> > > On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 16:25, Cliff Wells wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 15:39, Stephen Kuhn wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 10:30, Joe Polk wrote: > > > > We are a sensitive lot, no? :) > > > > > > > > <<JAV>> > > > > > > > > > > I'm sensitive mostly because this stuff affects my business - which puts > > > bread and butter on my table and takes care of my kids. This means that > > > I have to ditch the past seven months of mucking around with RH 8.0 and > > > the likes and start all over again - which is literally money spent. > > > > I doubt even moving straight from 6.2 to 8.0 would mean 'starting all > > over again'. No doubt your children need to eat, but the emotional > > appeal fails to convince me that nothing you learned on 8.0 will apply > > to 9. Many things I learned on Slackware 1.0 are still applicable to RH > > 8.0. I doubt the jump to 9 will make that much difference. It's > > *still* Linux, fer chrissake. > > > > > Sure, I'm touchy and sensitive - so in thinking pro-actively about my > > > client base and their servers, workstations and issues, I'll have to > > > spend even more time getting a grip on a new version (and I HATE .0 > > > versions) along with all the quirks, foibles and bugs a new version > > > presents... > > > > Or just the problems incurred by upgrading to a new version of dhcpd and > > having webmin not configure it properly? That happened to me on 7.3 > > without any sort of version change on the part of Redhat. Sorry, but > > stuff like that happens and that's why you get paid. If all was glassy > > smoothness *then* your children would be in trouble because your job > > would become unnecessary. Change is the only constant in IT and its why > > people who can deal with it are needed. If you can't handle change then > > you're in the wrong field. But then, perhaps that's why you need a > > certificate: to convince people you aren't. > > > > Sorry to be so blunt, but I get tired of hearing complaints about a > > digit and bringing emotional appeals into it makes it even more > > unpalatable. The only valid complaint I've seen so far has to do with > > possible issues about someone's RHCE being perceived as outdated by a > > clueless employer and if this is an insurmountable obstacle in an > > interview then you weren't very high on the list anyway. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Cliff Wells, Software Engineer > > Logiplex Corporation (www.logiplex.net) > > (503) 978-6726 x308 (800) 735-0555 x308 > > > > > > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
