I did a LoadModule mod_proxy.so in Apache, which is a perfectly fine way to do it in 2.x, evidently.
I did do ProxyPass and ProxyPassReverse with zero results. Everything still came back to the original, main server instead of redirecting over to the target machine inside the network. I could run the domains from my main machine, but I don't want to have to do that. That machine runs a lot of other stuff and I'd certainly like to offload webpages. I don't think this is a horrendous request to ask of a mature webserver. Evidently, it is. I'm going to proceed to Plan B now, which is to lose my will to live. :-) Thanks for the help in understanding. Brad > SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results > ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The > original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or > block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See > http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > SPAM: > SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.1 hits, 5 required) > SPAM: X_ANTIABUSE (2.4 points) Found a X-AntiAbuse header > SPAM: DOUBLE_CAPSWORD (1.1 points) BODY: A word in all caps > repeated on the line SPAM: MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ (1.9 points) URI: > Includes a link to send a mail with a subject SPAM: AWL > (-0.3 points) AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment SPAM: > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results > --------------------- > > Brad Alpert wrote: >> ProxyPass and ProxyPass reverse contained in the VirtualHost >> directive allows you to masquerade a local directory to another >> machine. What I need is a complete virtual presence from the >> inside server. If VirtualHosts doesn't allow this, I am >> surprised. > > Did you compile apache with mod_proxy? > > I don't think ProxyPass[Reverse] is what you're looking for, as > these handle direct path requests for the local server. > ProxyRemote seems to be more along the lines of what you're > trying to do, as it is supposed to map a URL to a remote host. > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxyremote > > Is there some reason that you don't/can't run the domains from the > same box? > >> And yes, IIS does allow the pointing of any number of inside IIS >> servers to a single, outside IP. Before I migrated my stuff to >> over to RedHat, I had three internal domains externally >> represented over my single IP, each with their own registered >> domain name. It's >> trivial, couple of mouse clicks and you're there. IIS uses >> "host headers" which is analogous to virtual hosts. Likewise, >> you can use fake internal IP's in IIS to do the same thing, as >> in Apache. > > It just seems strange that Microsoft would include a "proxy > server" in with their web server....when they would normally > charge seperately for both. :) > >> This has to be doable in apache.. I can't believe there aren't >> people out there on apache running any number of internal >> virtual servers, addressable by unique domain name, from a >> single IP. > > I'm currently running 5 external domains on the same IP, but > they're all on the same box. My internal domains are on a > different box, have a bogus IP, and only accessable from my > network (used mainly for dev purposes). I use the same DNS > servers to point to both, but the > internal names don't get announced to the outside world. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
