On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Steve "Stevers!" Coile wrote:
> I work for an ISP. We've got several boxes that share a lot of
> configuration information (password files, server configuration files,
> etc.). The idea of a robust, full-featured configuration system is very
> appealing, but I'm concerned whether folks in situations such as mine will
> be able to take advantage of it. I'm also concerned that, if Linuxconf
> is *not* designed to handle such a situation, whether its integration into
> the operating system would actually *disrupt* operation of our systems.
Have you considered NIS+ (NYS)?
=============================================================================
Keith Dart, Devtest Engineer <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cisco Systems phone: +1.408.527.1391
Network to User Business Unit pager: +1.800.365.4578
internal web page: <http://kdart-pc2.cisco.com> fax: +1.408.527.3778
=----------------------------------------------------------------------------
.||..||. The network kicks butt. No excuses.
=============================================================================
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
