> Dave Wreski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about my inetd patches:
> > They never got included for a good reason. This functionality is already
> > available by using ipfwadm to block access to ports to wish to restrict.
>
> And if I want to run different daemons on the same port number of different
> IP addresses? Or the same daemon but with different command-line
> arguments? I don't know any way to use ipfwadm to do that, and it was my
> primary objective.
Use the transparent proxy features. Run your services on non-standard ports,
and redirect traffic to the standard ports to the appropriate service based the
destination IP.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
14 days until Netscape releases source code
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.