> Dave Wreski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about my inetd patches:
> > They never got included for a good reason.  This functionality is already
> > available by using ipfwadm to block access to ports to wish to restrict.
> 
> And if I want to run different daemons on the same port number of different
> IP addresses?  Or the same daemon but with different command-line
> arguments? I don't know any way to use ipfwadm to do that, and it was my
> primary objective.

Use the transparent proxy features. Run your services on non-standard ports,
and redirect traffic to the standard ports to the appropriate service based the
destination IP.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin    PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
 PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5  E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   14 days until Netscape releases source code


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to