I realize this is a Linux list server, but I prefer to play fair.
I've been running NT ever since version 3.1 and it has NEVER crashed
on me without a good reason, and a solution readily available. All in
all my NT has been stable as a rock. I believe people badmouth NT
because they either fear Microsoft, envy, or don't have a lot of
experience with NT.
Personally, I managed to cause my Linux to lock up quite more often
and with greater ease than NT... Granted, I am a novice.
Vadim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mark Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, March 15, 1998 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: Apache 1.3
>Good morning
>
>I switched from NT-4.0 to Redhat 4.2 about 1 1/2 years ago...
>and (other than minor delays caused by my personal learning curve)
>I have had wonderful results with Redhat 4.2.....
>
>My server has never gone down unless I took it down for
>maintenance or upgrading....or upline isp problems.
>
>I feel that Linux is actually easier to configure and
>to make 'do what you want' because there are
>so many ways to solve problems,
>because there are so many helpful people on this list
>that will guide you and refer you,
>and there is so much information available on Linux.
>
>Also I have confidence that the 'brillant' people worldwide
>who have created this OS will continue to insure it's
>reliability and dominance worldwide.
>
>See: http://www.netcraft.co.uk for Great webserver/software useage
>survey!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>good luck
>
>Hank
>
>( With Linux...Happy as a hog in mud....)
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 15 Mar 1998, Mark Rogers wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Rita Meng wrote:
>>
>> > Is anyone using Apache 1.3 for Linux? I have Httpd 1.2.5 on
Redhat. I want
>> > to do virtual hosts but when I put the NameVirtualHost directive
in
>> > httpd.conf, it is invalid. The Apache doc says that it is only
valid for
>> > Apache 1.3. But the Apache site also says that 1.3 is in beta.
But my
>> > httpd.conf file comes with all the virtual hosts commands
commented out
>> > except for NameVirtualHost. So I am confused.
>>
>> Howdy, I moved two of my web servers over to 1.3b when I found out
I could only
>> do name based virtual domains under 1.3b and nothing earier. And it
works
>> perfectly. I don't have high traffic sites but 2 servers going
non-stop for a
>> couple of months now and not a single issue.
>>
>
>
>
>> > I am new to Redhat and Apache. I want to switch from NT Server to
Redhat
>> > for websites.
>>
>> Good move. ;-)
>
>I agree....48% of the worlds websites run on Apache...compared to
less
>than half that for Microsoft. It's world dominate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>See: http://www.netcraft.co.uk for their web server/software user
>survey.
>
>
>
>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Mark Rogers
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Northern Rivers Gateway
>> +61 (066) 216999
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
ARCHIVES!
>> http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
/mailing-lists
>> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>>
>
>
>--
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
ARCHIVES!
>http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
/mailing-lists
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
>
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
