>
>> If you see html tags in the text ... get another mail reader ;)
>
>> Please. Lighten up. The ability to communicate has NOTHING to do with
HTML.
>> However, having a link in a mail message that is available with a
>> double-click can be really clean.
>
>That's funny, I don't need a message to be in HTML to be able to open a URL
>from my MUA (Mutt). If this is your only reason to have HTML embedded in
>email, perhaps it is not us `Luddites' who should get a different mail reader.
>
I will be honest here, so sorry if I offend anyone. HTML in email pisses me
of. It has NOTHING to do with the ability to communicate, as was said
earlier. If there is a link I want to go to, I don't need to see it written
out twice because of crappy HTML code inconsiderate fool put in when they
weren't thinking about how long there mail would be for someone without an
HTML mail reader. I can type the URL into my web browser, it's not like it
takes 1/2 an hour. Wait... what if we make our messages in POSTSCRIPT! THEN
THEY WILL BE AMAZINGLY LONG AND UNDECIPHERABLE FOR ANYONE WITHOUT AN
POSTSCRIPT MAILER! Wait... HTML is already like that. :o)
--
You have been honored with a message from the great
Robert Hailman
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
