On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, John wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Riku Meskanen wrote:
>
> > Howdy,
> >
> > Could anybody from Red Hat comment why the appended message was not
> > delivered to list from our end?
> >
> Instead of bothering *all* ths subscribers, why not use the website to
> locate the list administrator?
>
Right, thanks for the comment. I just thought that it
would be nice to know if anyone else experienced the same
and second there was some content too ie. the appended
message which was definitely not OT.

> Quite possibly, the administrator doesn't listen to the list.
>
Also quite often list administrators don't have a clue what's
going on the MTA level and technical or performance problems
the list server might have. But thank's for the advise, I
forwarded the problem to list admin too.

The very reason I copied to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
because he/she usually have access to server logs and
can track down individual messages.

Let's hope [EMAIL PROTECTED] is awake, but I'm
not too optimistic any more. The places where the
postmaster is awake reply comes usually within a day
or so.

:-) riku

ps.     IMHO It's no excuse saying that the volume of postmaster
        is so high that nobody likes to read it -- well,
        the procmail filters help and it's not really that
        hard to write filters that really help. Our site
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets from many thousands to
        tens of thousands emails to postmater every day
        and the filters help so much that I can pick the
        relevant messages to inbox from the junk that needs
        to be checked only once a day. So it's just matter
        of will making postmaster work and being awake.
-- 
    [ This .signature intentionally left blank ]




_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Reply via email to