On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Bill Crawford wrote: > It would depend on the application ... ext3 is actually better for > some applications (according to a quick web search a while back, a > "real world" benchmark with some databases showed ext3 a winner). > ReiserFS on the other hand was optimized for Squid a while back. > You may get better performance for adding and removing small files > if you disable tail-packing (the "notail" mount option) but you'll > save space with it enabled.
Ah yes, i forgot about tailmerging. When I migrated an 80g filesystem from ext2 to reiserfs, I *gained* about 1gb extra space through tailmerging... pretty impressive! -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-] _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
