then, if we have wait, it'd be useful to try to "synchronize" the library path with rh releases (or make _helix_ package compatible with rh packages). e.g. rep-gtk-* packages from ximian and rh put into different directory the libraries and as consequence e.g. sawfish configuration not work in the control-center (can't find libraries) it's realy hard to follow the versioning. e.g. rpm assume rh's rep-gtk is newer than ximian's latest, so upgrade it and here comes the problems.... it'd be useful some FHS in this part of the system or even make some guideline about gnome's packages' default locations. IMHO it'll be bigger and bigger problem when more distro come up with more version. Mark Gordon wrote: > > Yes, but we haven't had time to test our packages thoroughly against > RH7.1. Beyond that, we'll also want to set up a channel for RH7.1 > packages, just as we have for every other platform supported by Red > Carpet. We'll have Red Carpet support for Red Hat 7.1 at the same time > we support Red Hat 7.1, I expect. Granted, it shouldn't be technically > difficult to port it, but that's not really the bottleneck. > > -Mark Gordon > > On 19 Apr 2001 09:52:39 +0200, Levente Farkas wrote: > > hi, > > it'd be useful to release a new red-carpet which can recognize rh 7.1 too. > > I'd be easy to upgrade since it can use the same rpms as rh 7.0. > > thanks. > > yours. > > > > -- Levente http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html > > "The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is > > ruining the bliss of ignorance." > > > > _______________________________________________ > > beta maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/beta -- -- Levente http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html "The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is ruining the bliss of ignorance." _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
