Hi, today I have received the annunce of the gcc-2.95.3

What are the differences between the gcc-2.96 (rh) and this gnu gcc-2.95?

The binary code will be compatible or there are the same differences as in 
the past with gcc-2.95.2 and gcc-2.96?

I had no problems with the new gcc-96, after the update, only really bad code 
didn't compile, except for the LEDA library (may be a bad code too!), if this 
release is "more permissive" but binary compatible with the redhat gcc, I can 
try to compile these library with the gcc-2.95.3.

If I am sure to fail, it is better not to waste time in downloading and 
building that gcc release.

One more question, the gcc-2.95.3 is the official release that would 
probabily be the gcc-3.0, so the standards will meet there again.
RedHat plans to continue on his road, or will put the gcc-2.95.3 in RedHat 
Linux 8 (supposing the gcc-3.0 will not be ready until then, even though this 
will be probabily wrong)?

Thank you,

Mario

P.S. I have tried Nautilus 1.0, I know RedHat is thinking about Nautilus as a 
desktop manager for Gnome, that's great, but be aware of two things that may 
need work on RedHat: Nautilus is unable to handle packages, the only thing 
that it can do is to pass them to a package manager, while the Gnome File 
manager can read any kind of package just opening them to a temp 
file/directory.

It is too slow, when I try to access the eazel service, or I try to use it to 
browse the web, If it cannot load the page immediately, it blocks and loop 
forever (two times need to be killed), I'm using the 1.0 version, and today I 
will sent a mail to eazel to try to describe these problems, I think you 
should be warned too, because you want to make nautilus (I read from the 
eazel home page) the primary Gnome desktop manager.
-- 
--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--
       http://frinemusic.8m.com
       http://antartica.sourceforge.net
       http://digilander.iol.it/linuxlabs
--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Reply via email to