Dominik Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trond Eivind Glomsrřd wrote: > > Dominik Mierzejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [snip] > > > Specifically, I have built many packages for myself based on RH spec > > > files but using new versions of software, for example: > > > > > > postfix-20010222 > > > tin-1.5.8 > > > > We're generally not interested in changes like that... > > Why? Because you could just tell the developer that a new version is out, rather than introduce a new spec file. > > of course, you can send a mail to the developer telling him > > I'll do that. > > > (no female developers in the OS Engineering group) > > Hey, what's that supposed to mean? :-) Reasoning behind "him". > > > (Do any of the developers look there anyway?). > > > > I don't. > > But there surely exist some quality (although home-made) packages > for RH, that never make it either into the main distro or into > powertools. Probably. But there is also a lot of other things there, perhaps with a very limited audience or which for other reasons aren't part of RHL.
-- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
